← Back to Case Studies
Automotive / B2B

Automating Vehicle Data Mapping to Slash Parts Lookup Time

A B2B automotive parts platform mapped an external vehicle data source to their internal catalogue, unlocking higher-quality coverage without pulling senior engineers off core work.

πŸ’¬Client Feedback

β€œ...excellent to work with - fast, professional, and highly collaborative with our engineering team. They deliver quality work quickly and communicate clearly throughout the process. Their technical skills and reliable approach have made them a valuable partner for our data projects.”

Pete RoomeCTO, Carpata

Carpata

Automotive / B2B
Company SizeScale-up (50-150 employees)
RegionUK / Europe
Engagement3 months
Time to ValueImmediately reduced parts lookup time from hours to seconds
Services Used:
Data Mapping & NormalisationRule-based & NLP MatchingWorkflow Automation & Optimization
⚑48Days to complete
πŸš—12Vehicle Makes Covered
πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»0Engineering overhead for the client
βœ…100%Process adherence

🎯The Challenge

The client operated a proprietary vehicle catalogue but relied on a paid third-party vehicle data source that used a different naming and coding structure. This mismatch limited how effectively they could use external data for parts matching and availability.

Key Pain Points:

  • Two vehicle datasets with incompatible nomenclature and coding
  • Manual mapping work pulling senior engineers away from core platform development
  • Risk of incorrect vehicle-to-parts matches if mappings were inaccurate
  • Need to validate whether the mapping process could be delegated safely
What was at stake: Without a reliable, repeatable mapping workflow, scaling to additional manufacturers would be slow, expensive, and error-prone.

🀝Why EndSpec

The client needed a partner who could quickly understand complex datasets, apply intelligent matching logic, and produce high-accuracy results with minimal oversight . We demonstrated deep experience in data normalisation, rule-based matching, and structured NLP β€” proving this work could be handled externally without compromising data quality.

πŸ’‘The Solution

We designed and executed a custom vehicle data mapping workflow, fully automating the mapping process to accurately align the external data source with the internal catalogue. Our approach accounted for both vehicle technical specifications and naming trims, combined with a tolerance for error to ensure high-quality results.

Implementation Phases:

1
Dataset & Problem Analysis

Reviewed the internal catalogue and external data source to understand structure, identify gaps, and define the mapping challenges and priorities.

5 days
2
Technical Specs Matching

Mapped and verified key technical attributes such as body types, transmissions, and engine specifications between datasets to ensure accurate alignment.

12 days
3
Vehicle Name Notation & Trim Mapping

Standardized vehicle naming conventions and mapped trims and variants to reconcile differences between internal and external nomenclature.

20 days
4
Mapping Tolerance Enhancements

Introduced error tolerance to handle minor discrepancies and edge cases, improving overall mapping accuracy and reducing mismatches.

3 days
5
Quality Assurance & Finalization

Performed detailed QA, corrected inconsistencies, and produced final verified mappings ready for deployment.

8 days

Technology Stack:

TypeScriptPostgreSQLDockerGit

πŸ“ŠResults

The project delivered a fully automated, high-accuracy vehicle data mapping workflow that eliminated manual effort, reduced lookup time from hours to seconds, and ensured complete alignment with the client’s internal catalogue.

MetricBeforeAfterImprovement
Parts lookup timeUp to 2h per querySeconds per queryImmediate efficiency gain
Engineering overheadSenior engineers heavily involvedclose to 0 involvementFreed core engineering resources
Vehicle makes coveredLimited coverage due to manual constraintsmost important 12 makes fully mappedExpanded, predictable coverage
Process reliabilityManual, error-prone mapping100% adherence to workflowConsistent, repeatable results
48Days to complete
12Vehicle Makes Covered
0Engineering overhead for the client

πŸš€What's Next

Following the successful project, the client is positioned to extend the same mapping approach to additional manufacturers and potentially automate more of the parts-matching process.

Ready for Similar Results?

Let's discuss how we can help your business achieve measurable AI outcomes.